Re: (ET) field weakening potentiometer with a Curtis 1204

["David Roden" <etpost drmm net>]

On 22 Jun 2017 at 7:30, Robert Laird wrote:

> You are only using a small portion of the total area available to
> dissipate the heat. 

Ah, thanks for the clarification, NOW I see what you're getting at, a heat 
dissipation problem.  You don't want your rheostat acting like a fuse.  
I'll 
agree that you need to check the rheostat manufacturer's datasheet to make 
sure its current rating is >= the load's full current.

That's one big advantage to using fixed field resistors as GE did -- you 
can 
calculate the power rating required for each fixed step, and set the steps 
so that it's low enough to keep the component costs down.

Or you can take the modern route (paved) and use a low power PWM 
controller 
to drive the field.  I see several 36v / ~350W DC brush motor controllers 
offered on Ebay in the $20-30 range.  Disclaimers: I haven't presonally 
tried this, and I know nothing about the quality or reliability of these 
little silver no-doubt-Chinese boxes.


David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
Note: mail sent to the "etpost" address will not reach me.  To send 
me a private message, please use the address shown at the bottom
of this page : http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =