[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ET) field weakening potentiometer with a Curtis 1204



I will add to your discussion that I have used a 50 ohm 25 watt unit for 12+ years in all positions with no problems.
Rob Brockway



From: David Roden <etpost drmm net>
To: elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: (ET) field weakening potentiometer with a Curtis 1204

On 22 Jun 2017 at 7:30, Robert Laird wrote:

> You are only using a small portion of the total area available to
> dissipate the heat.

Ah, thanks for the clarification, NOW I see what you're getting at, a heat
dissipation problem.  You don't want your rheostat acting like a fuse.  I'll
agree that you need to check the rheostat manufacturer's datasheet to make
sure its current rating is >= the load's full current.

That's one big advantage to using fixed field resistors as GE did -- you can
calculate the power rating required for each fixed step, and set the steps
so that it's low enough to keep the component costs down.

Or you can take the modern route (paved) and use a low power PWM controller
to drive the field.  I see several 36v / ~350W DC brush motor controllers
offered on Ebay in the $20-30 range.  Disclaimers: I haven't presonally
tried this, and I know nothing about the quality or reliability of these
little silver no-doubt-Chinese boxes.



David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Note: mail sent to the "etpost" address will not reach me.  To send
me a private message, please use the address shown at the bottom
of this page : http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =




_______________________________________________
Elec-trak mailing list
Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak