[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
(ET) Bad luck? bad lot? bad owner?
Subject
: (ET) Bad luck? bad lot? bad owner?
From
: tbamc <tbamc gbta net>
Date
: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:25:56 -0500
List-archive
: <
http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mhonarc/elec-trak
>
List-help
: <
mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=help
>
List-id
: Electric tractor discussion list <elec-trak.cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>
List-post
: <
mailto:elec-trak@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu
>
List-subscribe
: <
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak
>, <
mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/options/elec-trak
>, <
mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=unsubscribe
>
User-agent
: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)
<With it going from 6.25 to 4.1 makes me think bad cell. >
My first thought also, but cell s.g. same in all three. Not the case if
just one cell shorted?
Thon
Follow-Ups
:
Re: (ET) Bad luck? bad lot? bad owner?
From:
RJ Kanary
Prev by Date:
Re: (ET) Bad luck? bad lot? bad owner?
Next by Date:
Re: (ET) Bad luck? bad lot? bad owner?
Previous by thread:
Re: (ET) Bad luck? bad lot? bad owner?
Next by thread:
Re: (ET) Bad luck? bad lot? bad owner?
Index(es):
Date
Thread