[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) Solid state controls
- Subject: Re: (ET) Solid state controls
- From: "SteveS" <ssawtelle fcc net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:05:08 -0400
- References: <LPBBIFAILKDKOGDPGKLGOEEHDPAA.plitch@attglobal.net> <004f01c23288$de94ccf0$780910ac@aaas.org> <003701c2328f$2c5e87e0$0401a8c0@fcc.net> <006901c232a4$2feece00$ad5ba642@crystel.com>
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
Is what???? It's like losing the last page out of a good mystery!
Thanks for the info, A big reason I got the ET was to learn more about
electric motors. Even tho' I might not ever try any of these ideas, they
are
great mental exercises, and, eventually, one will stick to me until I
actually do it.
I wondered if the ET went faster in reverse,but I though it was my
imagination, as I always worry about hanging up the mower deck and flipping
it.
While on that subject, I bought a bunch of 3" plastic wheels and spacers
from McMaster to redo my rear rollers. Seems to help with the deck
flippage.
Some of my wooden rollers were down to 2".
SteveS
> 3) The FW circuitry is cut out in reverse. If you did happen to try and
> weaken the field, you would probably burn out the motor.The advantage
> (and
> this is an interesting one) is
>
> Neat stuff.
> Chris