> in this case the points are further out than they'd be if the centers were rotated
This is just breathing. Consider from this I formation: "center wave ah so". You should get a 2x4 without the ends having (virtually) moved. Their matrix position is the same as if they were points of diamonds (or ends of lines for that latter).
I think the tandems of three thing is precisely the standard diamond/qtag adjustment.
The disanalogy to phantom C/L/W, in my opinion, is that in this case the points are further out than they'd be if the centers were rotated. For the "exactly analogous to Justin's swing thru example", I would want the uncomfortable "tandems of 3 separated by half a matrix spot" position, with the cheeses being ends of a center wave. Perhaps it can be argued that these should be "close enough" due to a diamond/qtag-like adjustment.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 2:42 PM Andy Tockman <
andy tck mn> wrote:
regarding
> Separately, I don't like just "phantom diamonds", because I think that
> would apply if you were in four diamonds which are parallel to each
> other (all the centers are in a grand wave, and the points are pointing
> to each of the pairs in the grand wave), and then I would work in the
> center twin diamonds and the outside twin diamonds if you said phantom
> diamonds from there.
that's how phantom C/L/W already works, right? a lot of concepts have an
implicit "do it overlapped if people are t boned":
- split phantom C/L/W has people work in overlapped split phantom setups
if they're t boned
- O / butterfly has people work in overlapped phantom Os / butterflies
if they're t boned
- an ordinary scoot back has people work in overlapped phantom boxes if
they're t boned
i think in theory from BBGG waves, you could choose to say "boys hinge,
phantom waves acey deucey" and it does the same thing as "boys hinge,
phantom acey deucey". there's just no reason to say it because you might
as well just say phantom
so i think i like "phantom cut the diamond", as well as "phantom
diamonds cut the diamond"
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Judy Anderson via tg wrote:
> I am TOTALLY thinking of Dunlop. Thank you. So then the question is
> what is the actual definition of Dunlop, and is it spelled Dunlap, and
> could it apply?
>
> --
> tg mailing list
> tg cosmos phy tufts edu
> https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ
--
tg mailing list
tg cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ
--
tg mailing list
tg cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ