Re: [tg] terminology question

[Andy Tockman <andy tck mn>]

regarding

> Separately, I don't like just "phantom diamonds", because I think that
> would apply if you were in four diamonds which are parallel to each
> other (all the centers are in a grand wave, and the points are pointing
> to each of the pairs in the grand wave), and then I would work in the
> center twin diamonds and the outside twin diamonds if you said phantom
> diamonds from there.

that's how phantom C/L/W already works, right? a lot of concepts have an
implicit "do it overlapped if people are t boned":

- split phantom C/L/W has people work in overlapped split phantom setups
  if they're t boned

- O / butterfly has people work in overlapped phantom Os / butterflies
  if they're t boned

- an ordinary scoot back has people work in overlapped phantom boxes if
  they're t boned

i think in theory from BBGG waves, you could choose to say "boys hinge,
phantom waves acey deucey" and it does the same thing as "boys hinge,
phantom acey deucey". there's just no reason to say it because you might
as well just say phantom

so i think i like "phantom cut the diamond", as well as "phantom
diamonds cut the diamond"

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Judy Anderson via tg wrote:
> I am TOTALLY thinking of Dunlop.  Thank you.  So then the question is
> what is the actual definition of Dunlop, and is it spelled Dunlap, and
> could it apply?
> 
> -- 
> tg mailing list
> tg cosmos phy tufts edu
> https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ