[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) ET Headlights
I bought a light bar from Amazon to put on my snowblower:
Auxbeam® 7.5" 36W 3D LED Work Light Bar 3600lm DC 9-40V CREE Spot Beam 30
degree Waterproof for Off-road Truck Jeep Boat ATV Motorcycle Van
It seems like good quality and seems to put out good light, but I haven't
really tried it out but for a few minutes:
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1623/25239672462_38af3e36cf_m.jpg
I'm hoping the 40V rating is real and it will last - we will see, though
maybe it will be next year before we get snow again.
I had converted my headlights to 36V, but I had to isolate everything from
the frame. At some point I will go with LEDs for the headlights too. Might
just use another light bar but it would be nice to have something to fit
in where the current bulbs go. I have a bag of the 36V bulbs if anyone
needs any.
-SteveS
On 02/27/16, Steve Welch<oneoldbird icloud com> wrote:
David & all,
Installed the new LEDs and cut new plastic clear lenses for the lamps. I'd
say brightness is slightly improved over the standard incandescent, but
not by a huge amount. Probably some of the improvement may be due to the
colder light quality, but there may be some increase in absolute
brightness.
Since I don't really do much at night, I will probably run these until
something dies, however if I was looking for a substantial improvement I
would look elsewhere. Maybe to the ones Eric Adams recently posted
about...
I very nearly went with an off-road LED light bar that would have been
similar in cost to the two of these bulbs and may well have been a better
light. I would say that if the brightness of these new bulbs had been
focused specifically on the turf, it might be adequate for dusk/dark
mowing. But of course, it is just as limited by the stock reflectors as
the stock bulbs are. Oh well - at this price point I don't mind a bit of
trial-and-error.
Best,
Steve
On Feb 20, 2016, at 1:44 AM, David Roden <etpost drmm net> wrote:
> On 19 Feb 2016 at 19:26, Steve Welch wrote:
>
>> direct replacement LEDs:
>> http://www.m4products.com/1142-17-5630-nw-natural-white-elite-series-wi
>> th-brighter-samsung-5630-leds-1142-1076-ba15d-base/
>>
>
> Watch out for those "calculated lumens." That usually means the spec
> writers have simply summed the rated maximum output of the emitter chips
> used. The catch is that the chips can't all run at maximum output
> continuously because they'd overheat, so they never deliver their full
> outputs in these retrofit bulbs.
>
> I don't own a meter that measures lumens. That's lab stuff and
> expensive.
> To approximate the lumen output of various CF and LED retrofits, I use 2
> cardboard boxes (they really should be spheres) of the same size, lined
> with
> white paper. I turn off the room lights and put the test light in one
> box.
> Then I try various incandescents in the other box until I find the
> closest
> match in apparent light output. (The human eye is actually pretty good
> at
> matching apparent illumination.) Since the incandesent bulbs have rated
> lumen outputs, that gives me a rough estimate of the retrofit's lumen
> output.
>
> I've yet to try a 12v like this, but I've tried a few 120v multi-chip
> ("ear
> of corn" type) LED retrofits, all of them made in China. I find that
> they
> typically produce about one-third to one-half the claimed output.
>
> I looked on the website above. M4 products claim 640 "calculated lumens"
> for this little guy.
>
> They say it uses Samsung 5630 chips, but I can't quite tell from the
> photos
> how many (usually the specs say, but these don't). It looks like it has
> 5
> on the end and 5 or 6 pair around the sides, so maybe 15 or 17.
>
> The Samsung 5630 chip comes in various output ranges from S1 to S3.
> Depending on range, it's rated for an absolute max of 28 to 32 lumens at
> 4000K CT. Thus I don't see any way that this retrofit manufacturer (more
> likely importer) could even calculate 640 lumens. Seventeen of these
> chips
> would have a "calculated" output of 476 to 544 lumens. And as I say, you
> can't expect to get that output in the real world anyway.
>
> http://www.samsung.com/global/business/business-
> images/led/file/product/lighting/201312/Data_Sheet_LM561B_Rev.006.pdf
>
> Another odd thing. The retrofit bulb specs claim a CT of 4500K. Samsung
> doesn't show a 4500K chip in the spec sheet. Tthey jump from 4000K to
> 5000K. That could be an error in the bulb specs on the website, or the
> chips they're using might be knockoffs.
>
> I'd say put a retrofit in one side, incandescent in the other, and try
> the
> lights. If the pattern is similar enough, you can usually tell which is
> lighting up the garage wall better. And even if the retrofit has less
> output than the GE factory incandescent, you may find that you see
> better at
> night with it because of its higher CT.
>
> Please report back on how it goes.
>
> In the end, if you're satisfied with the performance and think you got
> your
> money's worth, then that's what counts.
>
>
> David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> Note: mail sent to the "etpost" address will not reach me. To send
> me a private message, please use the address shown at the bottom
> of this page : http://www.evdl.org/help/
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elec-trak mailing list
> Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
> https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak
_______________________________________________
Elec-trak mailing list
Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak