If someone can dig up more particulars, I'd love to see them. :) And it REALLY makes me wonder why this project was saddled with a power robbing hydrostat.But again, I'm not an engineer, nor do I............................ RJ Ken Muldrew wrote: On 14 May 2009 at 11:28, David Roden wrote:However, an electronic motor controller is effectively a continuously variable transmission without the inefficiency of hydro drive. Thecostof a small DC motor controller adequate for a garden tractor is certainly not prohibitive, and much less today than it was 30-35 years ago.Unless I'm misunderstanding the product description, the Ariens mower uses a brushless DC motor (a three phase armature with permanent magnets on the rotor and hall sensors for sequencing). It can't run without a controller so variable speed and reversing are available at the outset with no significant additional cost. The torque vs. speed trade-off could be managed through dual windings in the armature or switching from WYE to DELTA configurations, but given the limited needs of a riding lawnmower, even this seems unecessary. I don't understand why the hydrostat is there. Ken Muldrew. \----------------------------+----------------------------+ o_, O_/ \ Ken Muldrew, PhD | Voice: (403) 220-5976 | <\__/7 <\__ \ Dept. of Cell Biology | Fax: (403) 270-0617 | | / "\ L | University of Calgary | kmuldrew ucalgary ca | / / < +-----------------------+----------------------------+ / / Morning coffee recapitulate phylogeny L/ _______________________________________________ Elec-trak mailing list Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak |