[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ET) The Case for the Electric Tractor] (fwd)

Subject: Re: (ET) The Case for the Electric Tractor] (fwd)
From: Tim Humphrey <hump evgrin com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:26:42 -0600
In-reply-to: <010AD21F6AF45A45B9C0451167DEC75202455A1F@VFOHMLAO11.Enterprise.afmc.ds.af.mil>
List-archive: <http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mhonarc/elec-trak>
List-help: <mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=help>
List-id: Electric tractor discussion list <elec-trak.cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>
List-post: <mailto:elec-trak@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak>, <mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak>, <mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <010AD21F6AF45A45B9C0451167DEC75202455A1F@VFOHMLAO11.Enterprise.afmc.ds.af.mil>
User-agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b

I pretty much agree with everything Michael and Pieter said....

I would also like to echo Pieter's concern of the PTO driven implements. 
IMO the electric tractor should have an "electric PTO motor" One that is 
in the same location and has the same spline attachment as a "normal" PTO. 
Think of how much cheaper (err.. I mean more affordable) all of our 
Elec-Trak attachments would have been if they didn't come with their own 
drive motor. 

--
Stay Charged!
Hump
I-5, Blossvale NY

Prev by Date: Re: (ET) [Fwd: [EVDL] The Case for the Electric Tractor] (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: (ET) [Fwd: [EVDL] The Case for the Electric Tractor] (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: (ET) [Fwd: [EVDL] The Case for the Electric Tractor] (fwd)
Next by thread: (ET) JD 90 and 96
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread