[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: (ET) ET and actual fuel costs



Title: Message
Very well put.  You forgot to mention (for those not familiar with LPG) that LPG maintenance is MUCH lower than that of gasoline or diesel.  Battery electric is just better yet.  But in the case of a electric car you don't have to pay the $.40 a gallon (depending on where you are) tax to pay for the roads... yet.  That's part of your savings with both electric and LPG.
 
We have a calculator here (no, I can't give it out) that compares all the relevant fuel/storage/totals.  If you want to you could make your own in Excel from published data.  It does such things as comparing gas, diesel, lpg, cng, various alcohols (with their source costs), powdered coal, wood chips, palletized rubber (all those for internal and external combustion, or turbines in some cases), electrics from grid (the best you can do btw, but the infrastructure doesn't exist), electrics based on various batteries or on ultra-caps (most improvement in the last decade), fuel cells, hydrogen, anhydrous ammonia (my favorite as a farm kid-- 3 times better then pressurized hydrogen!), solar, inertia (flywheels), mechanical (springs) and so on.  Other than ultra-caps, the numbers have changed pretty slowly.  Each has pluses (yes, even gasoline... it's called availability--witness the silliness of Daimler's fuel cell from gasoline!), each has it's minuses.  Many have a real problem with the mass of the stored media (heavy batteries or chemical reactor) or conversion cost (compressing CNG is expensive and heavy).  It also compares the savings for incremental, such as hybrids or changing the efficiency of a transmission.  For example, adding 5% efficiency to an alternator that's used in 4,000,000 cars per year saves more fuel than every hybrid that's ever been sold by every manufacturer, but it isn't nearly as sexy.  But I digress; as you look at the logistical setup (that's much of the real cost) of fuel transport, you see why society is so slow to change.  It's not an easy sell to cost people, and since it goes across company lines, it' real hard to plan on.
 
Larry Elie
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: elec-trak-bounces cosmos phy tufts edu [mailto:elec-trak-bounces cosmos phy tufts edu] On Behalf Of Peter Bishop
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 7:50 PM
To: Stephen & Carol Welch; Gordon Trump
Cc: elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
Subject: Re: (ET) ET and actual fuel costs

I'm in the forklift business.  Going by "shifts" a heavy usage shift will be about 6 hours on the 'run time' or 'travel' hour meter.  A typical electric truck can run one shift per charge. Comparatively an IC truck under the same usage will use about 1 bottle of LPG.  We calculate charging an electric forklift to cost about $2.00 per day.  This compares with a bottle of LPG averaging $14.00.  A class I forklift battery can run around the $3200 range and the 'industry' says it will last 5-7 years.  So, $14/day x 5 days x 52 weeks =$3600.00. Vs. electric $2.00 x 5 x 52 =$520.00.  Take that over the 5yr minimum life of the battery (also a typical forklift lease) and you have $18,00000 vs 2600.00!  Furthermore electrics are far less maintenance than IC.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen & Carol Welch
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:22 PM
To: Gordon Trump
Cc: elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
Subject: Re: (ET) ET and actual fuel costs
 
I was doing some thinking about something similar while mowing last 
weekend.  To be accurate some further work is necessary:
(ICE vs. ElecTrak)
1.  Gasoline = electrons (energy source)
2.  Gasoline = batteries (storage medium)
3.  Gasoline mower also requires oil & filter changes & spark plugs.

So, comparing ICE with electric operating costs, one should factor in 
new batteries every 5 years (or whatever) since the gas you buy for 
the mower is also the energy storage medium.  Then on the other 
side,  oil & spark plugs for the ICE.  Most other costs (tires, etc.) 
could be considered comparable.

Just thinking it over (no calculators or spreadsheets involved) I'm 
guessing that the ET and the ICE would at least come out to be a 
wash, plus you'd have the added benefit of less noise, no fumes, and 
reduction in air pollution.

Anybody want to run the numbers?  :^)

On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Gordon Trump wrote:

> I have over 2 acres of rough terrain, but mostly flat lawn. My old 
> Craftsman tractor with a pooged 20 hp gas engine needs about 3 
> gallons (@$3.29 this week) = $10 to mow it.
>
> Very heavy mowing this week, but I used my (under restoration) C185 
> (E15) with front deck. Half on Saturday, half Sunday. Recharge 
> power was 6.17 kw and 5.2 kw = 11.37kw = $1.14 at my electric rates.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elec-trak mailing list
> Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
> https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak
>
>


_______________________________________________
Elec-trak mailing list
Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak