[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ET) better lift/no tapping of the pack
- Subject: RE: (ET) better lift/no tapping of the pack
- From: "Humphrey, Timothy" <HumphreyT neads ang af mil>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 11:38:04 -0000
- Delivery-date: Fri, 16 May 2003 07:38:21 -0400
- Envelope-to: elec-trak-outgoing cosmos phy tufts edu
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
Probably!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Coate [mailto:jbc coate org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 8:31 PM
> To: ET
> Subject: (ET) better lift/no tapping of the pack
>
>
> All this recent talk of ways to not tap the pack (dc/dc convertors,
> replacing the lift with linear activators, etc.) reminded me as I was
> ET-ing this evening:
>
> A couple years ago when ordering some parts from Bill Gunn,
> he was in a
> chatty mood and told me that he had worked out the design for
> a Bigger
> Better Lift that would run from the full 36 volts. It sounded like he
> had maybe begun toying with a prototype but never got much further.
>
> The last few times I've called it's been all business (maybe
> because I
> tend to know what I'm looking for now?) but if someone gets him on a
> quiet day and are seriously interested, might be worth inquiring.
>
> Since this is Bill's livelihood, he can't spend his time talking and
> making one-off units.
>
> To make it worth his while, I'd guess we'd need to round up a
> group of
> beta testers, willing to pay cash up front for him to set up a small
> run. If it worked well for the season, then it could become a regular
> stock item.
>
> Maybe?
>
>
> _________
> Jim Coate
> 1992 Chevy S10
> 1970's Elec-Trak
> http://www.eeevee.com
>
>