[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) ET No Go
- Subject: Re: (ET) ET No Go
- From: "Jim (fiskfarm)" <fiskfarm mediaone net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 18:53:01 -0500
- Organization: Suds & Service
- References: <3C625B12.296.2C09AD@localhost> <003601c1aff4$92c8d1c0$0401a8c0@fcc.net> <3C62F79A.B22E0CF9@mediaone.net> <00eb01c1b028$8bdbc1e0$0401a8c0@fcc.net>
- Reply-to: fiskfarm mediaone net
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
Steve,
No, I was actually originally confused if you meant by hand or under power
and
then I assumed and got off on stuck brushes. Sorry for the confusion. I
have
had some with the stuck or glazed brushes that cleared up nicely and
started
out as dead as yours.
Jim
SteveS wrote:
> Thanks again to all for the ideas and info!
>
> The revelation that what I may have is actually an E12S seems to make
> sense,
> as the schematic I was using was for an E12 and things weren't adding
> up. I
> just looked at an E15 schematic and it looks a lot more like my wiring.
> And
> there's the circuit card! So, is having an E12S a good thing (compared
> to an
> E12)?
>
> Can't wait to get home and go thru it armed with the right info!
>
> I'm a bit puzzled by Jim's surprise about spinning the motor by hand.
> Should
> it be hard to move by hand normally?
>
> Well like they say:
>
> "It's not what you don't know; it's what you know that ain't so"
>
> - Steve
>
> E12S!