Re: (ET) ET No Go

["RJ Kanary" <rjkanary nauticom net>]

Given the choice between the two, my preference would be either the E-12, 
or
the later E-15 HA or later. This is because those tractors do not have the
electronic controls.As Chief Engineer  Montgomery Scott once put it, "The
more they overthink the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain ! "
Simpler, IMHO, is better.


RJ Kanary @ Bandi Bros. Inc.
Member TRNi  Since 1998
ASE® Certified Master Auto Technician
Member Tech Line Associates Since 1987
rjkanary nauticom net

----- Original Message -----
From: "SteveS" <ssawtelle fcc net>
To: <elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: (ET) ET No Go


> Thanks again to all for the ideas and info!
>
> The revelation that what I may have is actually an E12S seems to make
sense,
> as the schematic I was using was for an E12 and things weren't adding up.
I
> just looked at an E15 schematic and it looks a lot more like my wiring.
And
> there's the circuit card! So, is having an E12S a good thing (compared to
an
> E12)?
>
> Can't wait to get home and go thru it armed with the right info!
>
> I'm a bit puzzled by Jim's surprise about spinning the motor by hand.
Should
> it be hard to move by hand normally?
>
> Well like they say:
>
> "It's not what you don't know; it's what you know that ain't so"
>
> - Steve
>
> E12S!
>
>
>
>
>