I think that both the comparison to C1 phantoms (leading to "phantom diamonds") and to overlapped diamonds (leading to "overlapped twin diamonds") make sense. The latter was what Coop said, iirc, but that shouldn't disqualify it just because we didn't immediately get it from that.
--As Justin says, it’s just like C1 phantoms, but for diamonds. Would “C1 phantom diamonds” work?EricOn Oct 28, 2024, at 1:05 PM, Justin Kopinsky via tg <tg cosmos phy tufts edu> wrote:This seems like an application of "phantom" as in C1 phantom or c4 phantom C/L/W, so I would want "phantom diamonds" (as distinct from "split" or "twin" phantom).--On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, 12:57 PM Mary Leland via tg <tg cosmos phy tufts edu> wrote:How about “perpendicular” formation?
Sent from my iPhone mdpl alum mit edu
> On Oct 28, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Sue Curtis via tg <tg cosmos phy tufts edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> From an "I" or bone formation, Coop wanted us to perceive a setup of 2 overlapped 8-dancer phantom formations, either a 1/4 tag or diamonds. What terminology would you like us to use for this? "Overlapped" seems like a relevant word, but "overlapped diamonds" already means something else.
>
> Sue
>
> --
> tg mailing list
> tg cosmos phy tufts edu
> https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ
--
tg mailing list
tg cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ
tg mailing list
tg cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ
tg mailing list
tg cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ