Re: [tg] terminology question

[Public <public brosius comcast net>]

As Justin says, it’s just like C1 phantoms, but for diamonds.  Would “C1 phantom diamonds” work?

Eric

On Oct 28, 2024, at 1:05 PM, Justin Kopinsky via tg <tg cosmos phy tufts edu> wrote:



This seems like an application of "phantom" as in C1 phantom or c4 phantom C/L/W, so I would want "phantom diamonds" (as distinct from "split" or "twin" phantom).

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, 12:57 PM Mary Leland via tg <tg cosmos phy tufts edu> wrote:

How about “perpendicular” formation?
Sent from my iPhone mdpl alum mit edu

> On Oct 28, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Sue Curtis via tg <tg cosmos phy tufts edu> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi all,
>
> From an "I" or bone formation, Coop wanted us to perceive a setup of  2 overlapped 8-dancer phantom formations, either a 1/4 tag or diamonds.  What terminology would you like us to use for this?  "Overlapped" seems like a relevant word, but "overlapped diamonds" already means something else.
>
> Sue
>
> --
> tg mailing list
> tg cosmos phy tufts edu
> https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ
--
tg mailing list
tg cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ

--
tg mailing list
tg cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/tg
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dhwcZ5WiDDthhD5UtmscuSndcUEAoM43CgmKAXJ4WvQ