[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Palindrome] Thoughts on leadership
Dear Palindrome Team,
We will soon be deciding how this team will be led over the coming year.
Here are some of my thoughts.
Several people have quoted Sprout. Sprout is a great leader who runs a
closed, top-down, hyper-organized team. His teams win Hunts, and put on
entertaining Hunts that are impressive in their slickness and freedom from
bugs. His leadership style is clearly effective.
Our team is a wide-open one that emphasizes cooperation, consensus, and
shared responsibility. Our teams win Hunts, and put on entertaining Hunts
that are impressive in their originality and influence. Our leadership
style has also been effective.
Cooperation, consensus, and shared responsibility are inherently
inefficient ways to run a team. (This is true for both solving and
constructing.) I sympathize with those who are frustrated by the
disorganization and duplicated effort of our approach. It *is*
frustrating.
Our approach also has enormous strengths. One is flexibility, which is
why we've been around far longer than any other team. Another is openness
to new ideas, which is why we've consistently led the way in Hunt
innovation: many elements people now consider crucial to the Hunt were
invented, or first tried, by us.
This is a proud and exhilarating legacy, and I think we should continue
using cooperation, consensus, and shared responsibility, Even If It Slows
Down Construction. This means that anyone who wants part of any task gets
part of that task, and no one has final say.
Frankly, if I were forced to choose one person to be our overall
Hunt-creation leader, I would pick someone with *no* prior experience. We
have a mature team with plenty of expert constructors; the basic tasks are
going to get done (though not so smoothly as on Sprout's team) no matter
who's in charge. Where our leadership can distinguish us is in bringing a
new vision to the Hunt.
I've run more Hunts than any other person, and I'm well aware of the
difficulties this approach brings. I think the benefits are more than
worth it. Other teams have shown great ability to refine and polish
existing Hunt ideas (which are often our ideas); no other team has shown
our ability to consistently make major successful Hunt innovations.
I believe in a living, growing Hunt, and I believe our team should
continue to use the strengths of our leadership style to guide the Hunt's
future.
-- Eric