Have you looked into "Chassis Saver" from Magnet Paints. Similar to Por 15, but supposedly much stronger. From: Briggs, Michael Sent: 5/11/2016 9:20 AM To: Steve Welch Cc: elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu Subject: Re: (ET) Best undercoating option for mower deck
Thanks Steve. I've always hosed off the underside of the deck after use to clean the grass off. What I'm thinking of doing this time is redoing the POR-15 process, but this time put a couple of coats of POR-15 on, and after it's had a month or so to cure,
putting a nice auto wax/sealant on (and doing that twice a year). As a test, I put some Collinite 845 (a very good wax) on before my last mow, and everything rinsed off very easily. As long as all bare metal is painted over (and the bolts are stainless), and
then covered with a nice hydrophobic sealant, I think that should be fine. Actually, here's what I can add - I can use my electric leaf blower to quickly blow any residual water off of the underside of the deck (and also use that for a quick cleaning of the
top side).
Mike
Michael S. Briggs, PhD
UNH Physics Department
(603) 862-2828
From: Steve Welch <oneoldbird icloud com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 8:16 PM To: Briggs, Michael Cc: elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu Subject: Re: (ET) Best undercoating option for mower deck Mike,
I've had similar struggles with POR-15 and other treatments. My last go-round, I used several coats of the POR-15 silver/gray primer after a thorough sandblasting. Didn't bother to apply a topcoat to the underside. That has stuck better than anything
else thus far (several years on it now), though it is not perfect either. I have also tried to minimize my use of water under the deck, reasoning that getting it wet frequently might be worse than damp grass stuck under there. Don't really know, though.
This subject comes up from time to time on this list and I am not sure there is a foolproof solution. Someone needs to engineer an affordable composite deck... :^)
Steve
On May 10, 2016, at 1:45 PM, Briggs, Michael <Michael Briggs unh edu> wrote:
|