[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ET) Triage - ideas from an unexpected result



Max,
  Sorry about the clothes dryer incident.
 
Couple of thoughts;
- DVM's don't measure resistance accurately below 40 ohms or so.
- The field ohms is direct Ohm's Law...
- Armature resistance practically determines "inrush current".... once it rotates, a DC armature generates a back EMF or internal voltage and will keep drawing amps based on RPM per armature volts input until the back EMF almost equals this applied volts.  So, it really doesn't mean too much as brush contact drop influences the resistance and a bunch of other stuff.  
 
Try it on the bench and see if it runs.
...Walt


From: Max Hall [mailto:mhall maxmatic com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:42 PM
To: Elec-trak
Subject: (ET) Triage - ideas from an unexpected result

You guys, I came upon a little mystery. At least, it's a mystery to me!

I have an e-motor that I thought was just a run-of-the-mill shunt-wound (run-of-the-mill except for being really large)... but when I measured the FIELD windings' resistance, I got about .6 ohms, and when I measured the ARMATURE resistance, I got about 30 ohms. Is it because my brothers put me in the clothes dryer (and turned it on) when I was little, or is that just perfectly backwards? (And yes, I'm sure the armature measurement is the armature... not just because of the giant "A"s stamped into the metal, but also because you can see the physical connection between the A terminals and the brushes.)

Thanks for any light you can shed, ETers. Maybe I'm gonna wind up doing armature weakening to make this one go fast...

And since this is tangent to ElecTraks themselves, I guess I should suggest responses off-line to my regular e-ddress, mhall maxmatic com... but I also guess that, unless I'm just backward anyway, the story might be interesting.

Best to everyone,

-Max

--
www.maxmatic.com