T-105s are 225 AH *if you discharge them slowly*. At the high currents
used by ETs, this capacity drops like a stone. Also, you can discharge
NiCds all the way without shortening life. So there's a lot less
difference in real capacity than the numbers suggest.
cheers,
Steve Gaarder
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Michael S Briggs wrote:
It looks like those are 1.2VDC (from another site) and 34 AH. 30 of those
would be $500, and in series give you 36 VDC - with 34 AH capacity. I
don't see the appeal of that, compared to T-105s (aren't T-105s over 100
Ah capacity?). Or is that 1.2 VDC that I got from another site wrong?
Mike
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Michael S. Briggs
UNH Physics Department
(603) 862-2828
---------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Klein Robert W NPRI wrote:
http://www.sg-photo.com/nicad_batteries.htm
_______________________________________________
Elec-trak mailing list
Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak
_______________________________________________
Elec-trak mailing list
Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak
_______________________________________________
Elec-trak mailing list
Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak