Re: (ET) desulfator

[David C Robie <mycroftxx1 juno com>]

Echoing this opinion.   Greatest by far on the subject of desulfators,
David.   The pros and cons on this are mostly cons - in the truest sense
of the word.
Dave
Weymouth MA

On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:25:46 -0500 Robert Adsett
<subscriptions aeolusdevelopment com> writes:
> At 11:26 PM 2/17/2007 -0500, David Roden wrote:
> >On 17 Feb 2007 at 17:50, Neil Dennis wrote:
> > > My, My, that was quite a reaction (;-').
> >Sorry, I don't mean to be overbearing about this.  I've posted 
comments
> >about desulfators many times before here, though, and didn't really 
say
> >anything especially different this time (though I said it perhaps 
> more succinctly or more bluntly).
> >Let's try it this way.
> <snip 
> David, that's one of the nicest summaries I've seen.
> 
> Robert
> 
> http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/
> 
>  From the Divided by a Common Language File (Edited to protect the 
> guilty)
> ME - "I'd like to get Price and delivery for connector Part # XXXXX"
> Dist./Rep - "$X.XX Lead time 37 days"
> ME - "Anything we can do about lead time?  37 days seems a bit 
> high."
> Dist./Rep - "that is the lead time given because our stock is 
> live.... we 
> currently have stock."
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Elec-trak mailing list
> Elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
> https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak
>