[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ET) hybrid ET

Subject: Re: (ET) hybrid ET
From: "steves" <ssawtelle fcc net>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:36:05 -0500
List-archive: <http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mhonarc/elec-trak>
List-help: <mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=help>
List-id: Electric tractor discussion list <elec-trak.cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>
List-post: <mailto:elec-trak@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak>, <mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/elec-trak>, <mailto:elec-trak-request@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <3FD264D5.16393.29A036@localhost>

Note to self-   "read all messages before replying".

Sorry if my comments were redundant, thanks for the source on pollution
David!

SteveS
E20

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Roden (Akron OH USA)" <roden ald net>
To: "Gordon Trump" <trumpgordon adelphia net>; <>
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: (ET) hybrid ET

On 6 Dec 2003 at 12:24, Gordon Trump wrote:

> Part of the downside of ElecTrak is moving the
> pollution back to the (coal burning?) power plant and it's 35% efficiency
> while we benefit from cleanliness in our yards.

This is an old myth used to dismiss EVs as impractical.  Here's an analysis
which debunks it:

http://www.evadc.org/pwrplnt.pdf

References:
- Re: (ET) hybrid ET
  - From: David Roden (Akron OH USA)

Prev by Date: Re: (ET) pollution
Next by Date: Re: (ET) Snowthrower Chute clogs with snow
Previous by thread: Re: (ET) hybrid ET
Next by thread: Re: (ET) hybrid ET
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread