[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
- Subject: Re: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
- From: "Jeremy" <nagidog starband net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:27:43 -0700
- Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:28:30 -0400
- Envelope-to: elec-trak-outgoing cosmos phy tufts edu
- References: <007501c30942$bd2c6280$5f02f5d1@jhcpc>
- Reply-to: "Jeremy" <nagidog starband net>
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
I have a feeling that those considering charging their elec traks via solar
panels do not currently have a solar system. I charge my e-12 exclusively
via solar power. Solar panels, as they are very expensive, are better
served if charging a large battery bank. I would not consider pulling off
three panels so I can directly charge my e-12, that would waste quite a bit
of power as the e-12 got closer to charged and the e-12 batteries were
sucking a very small amount of the amperage produced by the solar panels.
I
have 12 80 watt panels charging 8- L-16 batteries, I just plug my electrak
in to the 120 outlet from the inverter, the amount wasted by going through
the batteries is not as much as would be wasted by removing 3 panels, or if
I got 3 new panels they would definelty go on the big rack.
Jeremy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Crary" <jhcrary earthlink net>
To: "Elec-trak Mail List" <elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 7:47 PM
Subject: Fw: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
>
> Seems to me that a simple solution might be to put a delay circuit in to
set
> a delay between the times the charger is disconnected and can be
> reconnecteed.
>
> Herb
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "harry landis" <hlandis hotmail com>
> To: <elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 7:22 PM
> Subject: Re: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > That was the assumption. I just picked the number as an illustration.
> > My
> > controller won't work if there is a significant load on the battery
while
> it
> > is trying to charge it.
> >
> > Harry Landis
> >
> > From: "Christopher Zach" <czach computer org>
> > To: "harry landis" <hlandis hotmail com>,
<elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
> > Subject: Re: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
> > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:02:59 -0400
> >
> > Why is there a 1 amp load on the pack constantly?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "harry landis" <hlandis hotmail com>
> > To: <elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 9:52 PM
> > Subject: RE: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Say there is a constant 1 amp load on the battery pack while the
panels
> > are
> > > trying to charge it. Say the panels can put out 5 amps. Say the
> batteries
> > > are fully charged. As soon as the controller turns off the panels,
the
> > > battery voltage will fall a little below the quiescent voltage of 38
> > volts,
> > > so the controller reconnects the panels for 5 minutes. Now the
battery
> is
> > > being charged at 4 amps net. This will repeat as long as the panels
can
> > put
> > > out power. So the panels will be connected essentially continuously,
> and
> > so
> > > the batteries will get overcharged.
> > >
> > > My controller expects to be looking at the resting voltage of the
pack.
> > If
> > > it is looking at some other voltage, like the resting voltage minus
> some
> > > voltage drop due to current being drawn, it will not be able to do
its
> > job
> > > correctly.
> > > The current draw is a few milliamps.
> > >
> > > Harry Landis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: "Humphrey, Timothy" <HumphreyT neads ang af mil>
> > > To: "'elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu '"
> <elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
> > > Subject: RE: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:19:57 -0000
> > >
> > > I know it's your charger, you built it so you should know how it
works.
> > But,
> > > I'll have to disagree that it will over charge an in use battery.
> > >
> > > If the battery is being drawn from, I agree it's voltage will be low
> and
> > as
> > > such your control will either stay on or keep turning on. But, if
that
> is
> > > happening, then it is not charging the battery. It is merely causing
> the
> > > charger or solar panels to share the load with the battery. As soon
as
> > the
> > > load is removed the controller will start to function as required.
You
> > can't
> > > charge a discharging battery.
> > >
> > > One question I have about using it on solar panels though, is how
much
> > power
> > > does the controller consume itself? If it turns on at night, what
kind
> of
> > > drain will it present to the battery. It gets it's operating power
from
> > the
> > > battery, right? I know it could probably run itself for a decade or
two
> > on
> > > the ET's pack, but should those using solar panels consider a
dimlight
> > > disconnect, in order to keep what they just put in?
> > >
> > > Oh, and by the way, you'll be receiving my order for one soon.
> > >
> > > Stay Charged!
> > >
> > > Hump
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: harry landis
> > > To: elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
> > > Sent: 4/22/03 4:29 PM
> > > Subject: Re: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
> > >
> > >
> > > I think my controller would work fine with a DC solid state relay
> > > instead of
> > > the AC one. As it happens, I have some DC SSRs available. So if
anyone
> > > wants
> > > a controller with a DC SSR (30 amps, I think) just ask. Same price
($40
> > > including shipping). Note: this control scheme won't work on a
> > normal
> > > solar
> > > installation. It only works in applications like the ET where there
is
> > > essentially no power drain on the batteries while charging. If there
is
> > > significant current being taken from the batteries, the battery
voltage
> > > is
> > > no longer the rest voltage, but is lower due to the drain. So the
> > > controller
> > > thinks the battery is always low, and ends up overcharging it.
> > >
> > > Harry Landis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Jeremy Gagliardi com
> > > To: elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
> > > Subject: Re: (ET) Solar charging, part 2
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:04:28 -0400 (EDT)
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:00:07 -0400, "SteveS" wrote:
> > > > Yes, at the relatively low currents that we are talking about
> > (5A
> or
> > > so),
> > > > there are inexpensive controllers one could make or buy. Now,
where
> > > do we
> > > > buy cheap (err, inexpensive) solar panels?
> > > > SteveS
> > > > E12Ss
> > > > E20
> > >
> > > Okay, now the next question is who can build one (Harry Landis, are
you
> > > up
> > > to
> > > the task)? I haven't dabbled in electronics since I took a required
> > > course
> > > in
> > > college for my CompSci degree. That was 11 years ago, and I don't
> > > remember
> > > a
> > > lick of it. Although, if someone drew up a schematic, I might be
able
> > > to
> > > follow
> > > it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeremy
> > > E20
> > >
> > > > > This makes me wonder if it would be simpler to build a simple
DC
> > > > controller,
> > > > > similar to the Landis model. The Landis Controller is a solid
> > > state AC
> > > > relay
> > > > > with a simple DC monitor (when batteries go below 38V it turns
on
> > > the
> > > AC
> > > > relay
> > > > > to the charger). Can't a similar controller be built that
> monitors
> > > the
> > > > > batteries in the same exact way, but opens up a DC relay from
the
> > > solar
> > > > panels?
> > > > > The Landis Controller is only about $40.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>