[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) chains
- Subject: Re: (ET) chains
- From: "SteveS" <ssawtelle fcc net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:49:51 -0400
- References: <3D9B8782.6562BE11@realns.com>
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
I guess it's obvious I don't exactly live in the snow belt....
Thanks for the info - that's the kind of info that those that know take for
granted.
Another related question - I see 'two-link spacing' and 'four-link spacing'
chains. I can see the two link spacing would be better, but how significant
is it? I presume it must help quite a bit, as it sounds like that is what
you did (adding extra cross links). We usually get 6 inch snows here, with
an occasional 2 footer - although the last couple years has been almost
nil.
- SteveS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Dennis" <wombat RealNS com>
To: "Elec-trak" <>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 7:55 PM
Subject: (ET) chains
> Steve, the only problem you should see is that the side chains will be a
> little long, you may have to take out a cross link. The inch difference
> in the tire width will let the chains wrap around a little further -
> good thing as it give you more "bite"
>
> wombat - BTW, I add an extra cross link between each regular pair -
> cannabilize another pair.
>
>
>