[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) Controllers
- Subject: Re: (ET) Controllers
- From: Bfayette aol com
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:34:30 -0400
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
I would like to do this, too. I would use one of the PICs that has a PWM
interface. I also have access to high amp IGBTs for real cheap. My
solution to the current limiting problem would be to use a 1000A device.
As for the inductance problem, I had an ancient bipolar controller that I
used on a Commutacar. The manual suggested that you use a separate
inductor for non-series wound motors. Something like an inductor for DC
welding would probably be good.
Brad
In a message dated Thu, 2 May 2002 12:36:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
"SolidTech" <SolidTech qwest net> writes:
>OK... What really is the best way to have a controller operate? I've
>been
>looking back over some of the discussion and I see what appears to be
>tradeoffs:
>
>- PWM uses the available power most efficeintly (and a controller could be
>designed that used field weakening for the higher speeds)
>
>- "Analog" control provides regen braking for those downhill grades
>
> I've got a little experience building microcontroller (Intel) based
>controllers, so I believe building one wouldn't be tooooooo difficult -
>but
>the basic approach is what I'm wondering about right now. It sounds like
>the larger EVs use series wound motors without separate connections for
>the
>field, so we can't just use one of their controllers without serious
>compromise.
>
>Thoughts?
>- - joe
>
>Joseph Rock
>E-15 & MagnaTrac Hydro 5000 in Colorado
>
>
>
--
Brad