[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RE: (ET) different wiring
- Subject: Re: RE: (ET) different wiring
- From: "Bob Murcek" <RMURCEK geisinger edu>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:18:14 -0500
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
This'll sound lame, but has anyone tried using differently-sized batteries
to make up for the uneven load? I.e., hugh ones for batts that provide
12V, a medium-sized one for the batt that's needed for 18V, and
regular-sized ones for the rest? This would force the use of separate
chargers, though. Or isn't it worth the effort?..Bob
>>> "Elie, Larry (L.D.)" <lelie ford com> 10/31/2001 12:03:40 PM >>>
No, unless you break the series connection before you make this parallel
connection. If you are willing to add 2 high-current switches to break
the series connection, and another 3 to make your parallel connections.
The switches are expensive. It could be done, but if you failed to break
even one connection, you will blow up a battery. I'm sorry, but this
really isn't all that easy. Bill Gunn suggests just tapping off 12V and
charging a bit longer to make up for the imbalance. I designed a
self-equalizer based on parallel integrators that I might be able to post
after it is published (the patent will not be filed because the company
choose a more expensive charge equalizer). This is an old problem.
Larry Elie
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Gagliardi com [mailto:Jeremy Gagliardi com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:30 AM
To: Elec-Trak
Subject: (ET) different wiring
Instead of a DC-DC Converter, how about this?...
Hooking up the 12V components to the 3 pairs of batteries in parrallel,
like this:
12V+ to Batt1+ & Batt3+ & Batt5+
12V- to Batt2- & Batt4- & Batt6-
The 18V accessories would look like this:
18V+ to Batt1+ & Batt4+
18V- to Batt3- & Batt6-
Would that work?
--
(============================)
mailto:Jeremy Gagliardi com
http://Jeremy.Gagliardi.com/
(============================)