[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Privacy online



It's always been ok with me. 

My general thought is that it's nonetheless worth asking each person after a quarter if you want to post it somewhere other than bellboard. However, it usually only takes a few seconds to take a quick poll of the band, so I never really thought that much of it. (Also, I've never had anyone object to me posting on Facebook about a quarter). 

As far as I'm concerned, post away. 

-Michael 

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 4:31 PM Elaine Hansen <EHansen minlib net> wrote:
So long as it doesn't contain photographic evidence of my wardrobe malfunctions, I don't mind that the 2000 Twitter followers of old north know that someone named me rings a particular thing.  

On Mon, May 28, 2018, 10:12 Laura Dickerson <lauradi rcn com> wrote:
         The vicar at Old North asked beforehand if we were planning to
ring for the wedding of the now Duke and Duchess of Sussex. People did,
and it's up on Bellboard.  I was going to send the link to the church,
and then I started thinking of privacy. The historical site's twitter
feed @OldNorth1723 has two thousand followers.  In the Boston area
Clapper reports, I lean toward excessive privacy, not including anyone's
surname, even though the online version of the Clapper is password
protected.  Many twitter posts don't require logging in, securely or
not,  so would this be violating my self-imposed privacy line?  What do
people think?

Laura Dickerson


_______________________________________________
Boston-change-ringers mailing list
Boston-change-ringers cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/boston-change-ringers
_______________________________________________
Boston-change-ringers mailing list
Boston-change-ringers cosmos phy tufts edu
https://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/mailman/listinfo/boston-change-ringers