[Palindrome] Wrap-up Follow-up

[Scott Purdy <smpurdy btinternet com>]

I'm sorry we missed some of you at yesterday's wrap-up meeting. The 
Bombers printed special certificates (like those received for each 
meta) for each member of the team. If I didn't get one to you in 
person yesterday, please e-mail me a mailing address and I'll send it 
off to you. If you know Aaron, he probably picked up one for you, so 
check with him first.

Second, and relatedly, there are members of the team who joined late 
enough that they haven't been added to this mailing list. I know who 
a couple of them are, but if you know a team member who isn't getting 
these team messages, please have them contact me. One, in particular, 
that I'd appreciate contact information for is Sebastian. He joined 
the team in Lobby 7, and by that point things like team mailings were 
totally shoved aside in my head. But now, of course, I can't contact 
him and, in fact, don't even know his last name. If any of our other 
student members have his info, I'd appreciate it.

Third, there are a couple of things we need to do to move forward 
with constructing next year's Hunt. As has been mentioned, we'll need 
to set up a new mailing list and wiki. Also, I'm going to attempt to 
discuss a post-Hunt survey with the Bombers, so we can get other 
teams' opinions of what worked and didn't about this year. I'd like 
to see these things taken care of by the end of the week so people 
will have a forum to start discussing themes and structures.

And we'll need a leader. I'm happy to coordinate some of this initial 
stuff for now, but I don't think I'm the best person to manage this 
process. So, for now, I'm looking for volunteers (not nominees) to be 
the person in charge of leading the construction process. We'll 
eventually need to delegate some of the work to other individuals, 
and I'm led to understand that certain management tasks will need to 
be undertaken by a current (or at least very recent) MIT student, but 
I think (and those who have done this in the past should correct me 
if I'm wrong) that the process will be better served by one person at the top.

Scott