[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) Fine control
- Subject: Re: (ET) Fine control
- From: "Christopher Meier" <mr23 mn rr com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 21:01:08 -0500
- References: <3D41DA77.90802230@earthlink.net> <026c01c234fd$ba0846b0$0201a8c0@avitar2>
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
How about putting an additional inductor in series with the first resistor?
Comments?
-Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "RJ Kanary" <rjkanary nauticom net>
To: <wilbett earthlink net>; "elek-trac Discussion group Bob Murcek"
<elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: (ET) Fine control
> Some thing else, you may consider, is using the three armature resistor
> control scheme, used in the E-20 models, DA and older. That is the
> biggest
> reason I like that model. The breakaway is much smoother than the other
> models, and maneuvering around obstacles has less of a thrill factor.
> Just
> my opinion, but you really ought to try one !
>
>
> RJ Kanary
> Member TRNi Since 1998
> ASE® Certified Master Auto Technician
>
> rjkanary nauticom net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <wilbett earthlink net>
> To: "elek-trac Discussion group Bob Murcek"
<elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 7:25 PM
> Subject: (ET) Fine control
>
>
> > Bob Murcek,
> > Thanks for your suggestion on Fine Control. But I don't understand it.
> > Did you actually make 7 electrical speeds on your ET? If so, how
> > did
> you make
> > cams to actuate the 7 micro switches? Or did you modify the existing
cams?
> Or are
> > there un-used cam ridges in the ET which you used?
> > Maybe a simple fix for me would be to just make the low speed
resistor
> (R1) a
> > higher resistance. That would make the first speed slower and not
> > effect
> anything
> > else.
> > Bill Alburty
> >
> >
>