[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ET) 2 "NEW "electraks on ebay
- Subject: Re: (ET) 2 "NEW "electraks on ebay
- From: "Jeff Tickner" <JeffT softlanding com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:37:13 -0400
- Sender: owner-elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu
I have to second the "if it really sat in a warehouse" part
The auctions seem a bit suspicious, since the guy doesn't talk about
shipping, or condition of the tractors and only wants a cashiers check.
Every other electrak auction mentions shipping is going to be a pain :-) If
anyone goes for these don't do a wire tranfer of the money thinking it will
be safe. I've been hearing about a lot of wire tranfer fraud, people
getting the check even without the confirmation number, and then not
delivering the goods.
BUT I could be wrong.
"Christopher Zach"
<czach computer org> To: "Chapin,
Tim" <tchapin umich edu>, <elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
Sent by: cc:
owner-elec-trak cosmos ph Subject: Re: (ET)
2 "NEW "electraks on ebay
y.tufts.edu
04/10/02 12:17 PM
Hm. If it really sat in a warehouse for 30 years....
It probably has toast in the battery compartment.
The tires are probably either rotted or destroyed
The oil in the transmission is probably dinosaur goo
The belts are probably rotted and flattened
There are probably either mouse nests or ratnests in the wiring
The wiring has probably been eaten.
Seriously, I can't see why such a premium would be charged on a 30 year old
"never used" item. Mechanical things that are not used for long periods of
time simply tend to go bad.
Myself, I would prefer a sometimes used well-cared for ET. That would
command the best premium.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chapin, Tim" <tchapin umich edu>
To: <elec-trak cosmos phy tufts edu>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:49 AM
Subject: (ET) 2 "NEW "electraks on ebay
> I-5 starting bid $1500
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2015965016
>
> e-12 starting bid $1800
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2015966694
>
> both in tex.
>
> Why can't I fine things like this......
>